Although I was a voracious reader in my youth and read all
around me, somehow ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ stayed off my radar and was filed
away in my mind as one of those ‘must read’ books that just never happened.
However, when Harper Lee released a new novel, ‘Go Set a Watchman’, it piqued
my interest and it prompted me to take up the first and finally read it.
Having had lots of time on my hands lately (see Struggles with being ill), I’ve
been catching up on reading and have had lots of blissful uninterrupted time to
actually absorb myself in a novel.
‘To
Kill a Mockingbird’ was a joy, a beautiful flowing unselfconscious look at the life
of a little girl experiencing her own world amidst a reluctantly changing
culture and issues of race and privilege.
Her moral compass at all times is Atticus, a somewhat
eccentric father, but kind and upright, and Scout lives in an innocent world of
games and friends, untouched for the
most part by the uglier undercurrents shifting around her. The book held me
from start to finish, it was like being surrounded by a soft duvet of language,
comforting and serene. There was a
certainty and a security that each of the key characters would fulfil an
unspoken promise, a bond of goodness and truth.
The ending was possibly the best finale of any book I have
read, it cheered and inspired me and made me feel positive about humanity.
I deliberately didn’t read any reviews of ‘Go Set a
Watchman’ before starting it. I didn’t want to begin with any outside
preconceived ideas. I did have fairly high expectations though, just based on
my positive experience with ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’.
The novel is set at a point later in time than ‘To Kill a
Mockingbird’ although it was actually written first. Scout is 26 now and our first introduction to
her is as she travels home to Alabama on the train from New York.
She has retained the free spirited independence which drew
me to her character right from the start, 20 years later she still pushes the
boundaries of what is expected of a genteel young Southern lady, is a strong
voice in her own right and declines to bow to fashion norms or the dictates of
a cloistered society which expects females to be decorative and weak.
Apart from the consistency in the portrayal of Scout, the
book deviates from what I had expected. Similar in writing style, it has brief
glimpses of the magic of To Kill a Mockingbird but there is a strangely
disjointed effect, a feeling that the jigsaw pieces haven’t quite been put
together properly.
Atticus is old and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis and
Aunt Alexandra has moved in to take care of him. The fractious relationship
between Scout and Alexandra is the same although an older and wiser Scout sees
the kindness behind the stiff façade and it tempers her impatience.
Henry is in love with Scout and although she has feelings
for him, being married to him is not a certainty in Scout’s mind.
The crux of the novel is an issue of race and as in ‘To Kill
a Mockingbird’, Lee spends much time laying the ground work, letting us get to
know the characters and the locale before revealing a perturbing event which
has an impact on everyone.
In ‘Go Set a Watchman’ this event is a meeting of the Maycomb
County Citizens’ Council. Henry and Atticus disappear and Scout is intrigued by
their whereabouts so follows and listens in to speeches at the meeting. The
shock of hearing vile racist sentiment from the guest speaker causes a huge
emotional crisis for Scout and unravels everything she has believed heretofore
about her father. She believes that his presence there, and that of Henry,
implies approval and support for the hateful feelings exhibited.
What follows is where the book lost me really. Scout turns to her Uncle Jack Finch to lay
out her troubles. His plan to make things right involves, amongst other things,
recounting to Scout a potted history of the South and difficulties with the
Constitution and an illustration of the clannish nature of Southerners and her own kin.
Although, finally, I could see where Harper Lee was going with
this thread (in my interpretation anyway), it didn’t make it any easier for me
that Uncle Jack was essentially justifying actions and condoning her Father’s
tacit support of actions against black people.
My interpretation of events was that an older Scout needed
to understand the complexities of human relationships, the myriad of ties that
bind us and that influence our actions. Her initial rage was tempered by
absorbing this realisation and she seemed to come to a new emotional maturity
and independence. Frankly though, it was disturbing and I was left with the
feeling that perhaps Harper Lee hadn’t quite articulated what she was trying to
say. Or perhaps it was just me and my reluctance to see the legend of Atticus
Finch reduced to a bigoted old man.
Although it didn't have the moral clarity of 'To Kill a Mockingbird', it was hopeful in its representation of Scout. Uncle Jack encouraged her to move back to Maycomb, saying
"That's the one thing about here, the South, you've missed. You'd be amazed if you knew how many people are on your side, if side's the right word. You're no special case. The woods are full of people like you, but we need some more of you".
In conclusion, for me, it didn't have the satisfying feeling of completeness that 'To Kill a Mockingbird' gave, although I can't help feeling regret that we haven't seen more works from such an amazing talent.
Do let me know if you've read the book, would love to hear what you think!
Available from book stores and your local library.
Sounds like an interesting book. I like the fact that you didn't read any reviews before. It is best to read something with fresh eyes and build your own opinions based on your experience! :)
http://lilinhaangel.com/
oh now this is a title that I recognise but have yet to read so I am going to put it on my wish list for next month I have 2 sat waiting to be read but I think I may just give this a try
I myself I am an avid reader but I am more into romantics than other genres. I have heard the title to kill a mocking bird but honestly had no clue what it was about and the second book got set a watchman doesn't sound intriguing enough for my to check it out but kill a mocking bird does. Sorry to hear you didn't quite liked the go set the watchman.
Anosa
I absolutely loved To Kill a Mockingbird, but not too keen on Go Set Watchman I have to admit, I did find it hard to settle into and wondered whether I should have re-read to Kill first x
Ah both of To Kill a Mockingbird and Go Set a Watchman are on the to-read list, especially since the sad news of Harper Lee's death. I haven't managed to completely avoid the reviews of Go Set a Watchman like you did but I'd still like to read it with an open mind. LPMx
I am sorry to hear that you have been ill and hope that you feel better soon. I would like to read the next book as I did like How to Kill a Mockingbird!
I can't say I have read either but need to. Hope you feel better soon xx
I always like to make my own mind up about books too and I would try and stay away from reviews and also if there is a film as otherwise I end up picturing the film and not the story in my head. I have not read either of these although how to kill a mocking bird is on my list! Hope you feel better soon.